GlenCombHIGHLAND HONEY

Honey guide

Telling the Bees — Welsh Folk Tradition

The custom of telling the bees about births, deaths, marriages, and departures survived in parts of Britain and Wales longer than many people realise.

By Honey Honey Honey · Published 3 June 2026

Glencomb 58

What is "telling the bees" and where did the tradition come from?

Telling the bees is a folk custom in which the keeper of a hive formally informs the bees about significant events in the household — most commonly a death, but also marriages, births, and the arrival or departure of family members. The practice is recorded across Wales, England, Scotland, and much of northern and western Europe from at least the seventeenth century, though its origins are likely older.

The custom is rooted in a widespread folk belief that bees are not merely livestock but sentient members of the household, privy to family news and capable of reacting to it. Bees were believed to possess unusual intelligence, moral sensitivity, and an almost spiritual awareness of human affairs. Failure to inform them was thought to cause the colony to leave the hive, fall ill, stop producing honey, or die entirely — all economically catastrophic outcomes for households that depended on bees for wax, honey, and mead.

In Wales, the tradition carried particular weight because bees occupied a defined legal and cultural position. Under the Laws of Hywel Dda — the medieval Welsh law code compiled in the tenth century — bees had a specific monetary value and were governed by rules about ownership, theft, and movement. Bees mattered legally and practically, which encouraged a relationship between keeper and hive that was more personal than purely commercial.

The earliest surviving written descriptions of the practice in Britain appear in the seventeenth century, though the tradition appears in folk accounts that suggest much older roots. The custom was recorded by antiquarians, diarists, and poets throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, particularly in rural Wales and the west of England, by which point it was already being described as an old custom worth preserving in writing.

What events were bees traditionally told about in Wales and England?

Death was the event most consistently associated with bee-telling across British sources. When the head of the household — the beekeeper themselves, or the owner of the hives — died, surviving family members were expected to go to the hives and inform the bees of the loss promptly, often before news was spread to neighbours or distant relatives. The bees were told first.

In Welsh practice, the hives were sometimes draped in black crepe or mourning cloth, the same material used in human funeral preparations. The visual treatment of the hive as a mourning subject — not merely a livestock container — marks how deeply the bees were embedded in domestic ritual.

Marriages were also announced to the bees in many recorded variants of the custom. In some accounts, a piece of wedding cake was brought to the hive and an invitation to the wedding extended. In others, simply announcing the event aloud near the hive sufficed. The goal was inclusion: the bees should know that the household structure had changed and should not feel overlooked.

Births, the arrival of a new servant, the departure of a family member for military service or emigration, and the sale of property were all recorded as occasions for bee-telling in various regional accounts. The consistent thread is any change in household membership or fortune. Bees were understood to share the household's fate, and courtesy required keeping them informed.

In some English regional variants, bees were told before long journeys. A beekeeper setting out on an extended absence might speak to the hive, explain that they were leaving, and name whoever would tend the hives in their absence.

How was the ceremony performed — what did the keeper actually say and do?

The ceremony varied by region and household, but the basic structure was consistent: the keeper approached the hive, knocked or tapped gently on the woodwork to announce their presence, and then spoke to the bees in a formal but personal address. The speech acknowledged the event, named the person involved, and in the case of a death, explicitly transferred the relationship to the new keeper.

In Welsh and English accounts, the address was often brief and formulaic. A common form recorded in several nineteenth-century sources was: "Little brownies, [name] is dead" — with variations naming the deceased and asking the bees to remain. The phrase "little brownies" appears across multiple Welsh and English records and seems to have been a respectful form of address to the colony, treating them as small creatures of known character rather than anonymous insects.

When the death being announced was the beekeeper's own, the task fell to a family member — typically the widow or eldest child — who was unfamiliar to the bees and therefore needed to introduce themselves as the new keeper while delivering the news. The transfer of relationship was explicit in some accounts: the bees were told who would now care for them and asked to accept the arrangement.

In some Welsh accounts, the person telling the bees repeated the announcement three times, reflecting the widespread folk use of triple repetition as a form of ritual emphasis. The hive was not simply informed once but told three times to ensure the message was received.

Some accounts describe feeding the bees at the same time — offering a small amount of sugar syrup, honey, or a crumb of food from the funeral meal — as an act of inclusion in the household's shared mourning. The bees were not only informed but fed from the same occasion that fed the human mourners.

What was supposed to happen if you failed to tell the bees?

The consequences described in British folk accounts were severe and specific: the bees would leave the hive, swarm without returning, stop producing honey, or die entirely. These outcomes were not metaphorical; they were understood as actual consequences of disrespect or neglect. Because bees were economically essential to pre-industrial households, these consequences represented genuine material loss.

Bees leaving the hive without warning — absconding — was a real possibility and not well understood in pre-scientific beekeeping. A colony that absconded left behind empty comb, no honey reserves, and no immediate replacement. Attributing this to the bees' displeasure at not being told of a death was a coherent explanation within a worldview that gave bees agency and moral response.

In some accounts, the bees' failure to thrive after an untold death was taken as confirmation that the omission had been punished. If a colony declined in health or productivity in the months following a bereavement without bee-telling, the connection was made retrospectively. The belief was self-reinforcing: when bees did poorly after an untold event, the custom was validated; when they did well, the positive outcome was attributed to other causes.

The belief also served a practical function. It ensured that beekeeping responsibilities were not simply forgotten during the disruption of bereavement. A household told by custom that bees must be informed would send someone to the hives promptly, ensuring the colonies were checked and tended during a period when normal routines were disrupted. The ritual maintained hive care through crisis.

Why were bees thought to be sensitive to grief and family news?

Several overlapping folk beliefs explain why bees were credited with emotional and social sensitivity. Bees were observed to behave differently around agitated or grieving people — a perception that may have had some basis in the genuine reality that stressed or fearful beekeepers handle hives poorly, provoking defensive behaviour. The apparent connection between human emotional state and bee response made the bees seem perceptive.

Bees were also unusual livestock. They could not be seen individually at work; the colony functioned as a single responsive mass with apparent collective intelligence. Their internal hive order — with a single queen, obedient workers, and strict hierarchy — mirrored idealised human social structures. Folk thinking across cultures has attributed human-like social intelligence to creatures whose social organisation resembles human society.

In Christian folk theology, bees held a special status. They were associated with purity (beeswax candles lit in churches and religious ceremonies), with industriousness as a moral virtue, and in some traditions with a direct spiritual lineage from Paradise. Several medieval texts describe bees as originally coming from heaven or as uniquely innocent creatures. This spiritual elevation made bees appropriate participants in rituals of loss and transition rather than merely useful animals.

Welsh folk tradition placed particular emphasis on bees' connection to the soul. In Welsh belief recorded in several nineteenth-century accounts, bees were associated with the souls of the dead, and the departure of a swarm was sometimes interpreted as the passage of a soul. This belief made bee-telling at a death feel not merely polite but spiritually necessary — informing the bees and the soul simultaneously.

Glencomb 44

How widespread was bee-telling across Britain and Europe?

Bee-telling was not a purely Welsh or British custom. Variants of the practice were recorded across England, Ireland, Scotland, France, the Netherlands, Germany, and as far east as Lithuania and Romania. The geographical spread indicates that the belief arose independently in multiple cultures with comparable beekeeping traditions rather than spreading from a single source.

In England, the strongest concentration of recorded practice appears in the west — Shropshire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire, Gloucestershire — and in Cornwall, Somerset, and Devonshire. These regions overlap with the areas of Wales where beekeeping tradition was strongest, suggesting a shared cultural zone along the border.

German-speaking regions have their own well-documented bee-telling traditions, particularly in Bavaria and the Rhineland, where hives were dressed in mourning cloth and specific phrases addressed to the bees appear in folk records. The Dutch custom of bijenrouw (bee mourning) follows essentially the same pattern as the British versions.

In Ireland, the custom appears in Gaelic-language areas and was sufficiently familiar that it formed part of general folk descriptions of rural life. The phrase used in some Irish accounts — speaking to the bees in Irish rather than English — suggests the custom was embedded enough in community life to carry linguistic identity.

The consistency across cultures that had no direct contact with each other suggests the practice arose from shared practical and psychological conditions rather than cultural transmission: beekeeping households across pre-industrial Europe had similar economic dependence on hives, similar limited understanding of colony behaviour, and similar tendencies to extend social relationships to animals on whom they depended.

What written records document the tradition in British history?

The earliest sustained written documentation of bee-telling in Britain appears in antiquarian and natural history writing of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, though individual references appear in earlier texts. John Aubrey, the seventeenth-century antiquary, recorded folk practices including bee customs in his collections of English folklore, which provides one of the earliest datable British sources.

By the nineteenth century, the tradition was well documented in county folklore collections. Samuel Hartlib's Correspondence from the 1650s and later publications in the county folklore series produced by local antiquarians across England and Wales record bee-telling as an established practice, usually described as old or ancient — suggesting the writers understood themselves to be documenting something that was already declining.

John Greenleaf Whittier, the American Quaker poet, published his poem "Telling the Bees" in 1858, drawing on the tradition to describe a young man discovering a death through observing a servant telling the hives. While Whittier was American, the poem was based on a practice he knew from his New England community, which had brought the custom from England with early colonial settlers. The poem's popularity in Britain confirmed the custom's literary standing.

Welsh-language sources, including nineteenth-century periodicals such as Y Gwyddoniadur (the Welsh Encyclopaedia) and various eisteddfod papers, include bee-telling among documented folk customs, sometimes with regret that the practice was fading from common use. The Welsh concern with preserving national folk traditions through the nineteenth century gave bee-telling a more continuous written record in Wales than in some English regions.

Does the tradition survive in any form in Britain today?

The tradition survives symbolically among some beekeepers, more as personal ritual or heritage gesture than as literal belief in bee sentience. Contemporary beekeepers — particularly those who have inherited hives from family members, or who keep bees at home rather than professionally — occasionally mark a death by going to the hives to "tell" them, understanding the act as a moment of reflection rather than a practical necessity.

Heritage and cultural organisations in Wales have preserved bee-telling as part of the documentation of Welsh folk practice. The Museum of Welsh Life at St Fagans in Cardiff holds material on Welsh beekeeping traditions including the telling custom, placing it in the context of rural domestic life rather than superstition.

Some rural community events and harvest festivals in border counties — Herefordshire, Shropshire, parts of Somerset — include bee-telling demonstrations or references as part of heritage programming. It appears in folk plays, living history demonstrations, and rural craft shows as an illustration of how close the relationship between beekeeping households and their hives once was.

Contemporary poets and writers return to bee-telling regularly as a subject. The image of a person knocking on a hive to deliver news of a death has enough emotional resonance to carry in writing without requiring the reader to share the original belief. The tradition persists in British cultural memory partly because it captures something true about grief, dependence, and the desire to include the non-human world in human loss.

What does the persistence of this tradition tell us about the historical relationship between humans and bees?

The persistence of bee-telling tells us that bees occupied an intimate, almost familial position in pre-industrial British households that modern commercial beekeeping does not replicate. In a household where honey provided sweetening, mead, and candle wax — where the bees' health directly affected the household's winter food supply, its income from wax sales, and its ability to illuminate the dark — the relationship between keeper and hive was continuous, attentive, and personally invested in a way that managing a cash crop is not.

Bees lived physically close to the house. Traditional British skep hives and early wooden hives were placed in bee boles — niches built into stone garden walls — directly adjacent to the cottage or farmhouse. The keeper saw the hives every day, observed their behaviour season by season, and developed knowledge of their rhythms that was genuinely useful. This closeness produced the kind of relationship in which the impulse to speak to the bees about a death is emotionally coherent rather than merely superstitious.

The custom also reflects the economic weight that a colony represented. A strong hive in the eighteenth or nineteenth century was a significant asset. Losing it to absconding or disease was a serious blow. The rituals around bee management — telling them of deaths, draping them in mourning cloth, feeding them from wedding celebrations — were also rituals around protecting an economically critical asset from behavioural disruption. The folk belief provided structure for maintaining attentiveness to the hives during periods of household stress.

Contemporary beekeeping, scaled, commercialised, and managed with modern tools and veterinary treatments, has lost the intimacy that made bee-telling feel natural. The tradition's appeal to modern readers is partly nostalgia for a relationship between humans and animals that most of us no longer experience in our own lives.

Frequently asked questions

What does telling the bees mean?
It means informing the hives of major household events, especially deaths.
Was this tradition really practised in Britain?
Yes. Variants were recorded in Wales, England, and elsewhere in Europe.
Why were bees told about a death?
People believed the bees needed to be included or they might leave, stop producing, or die.
Is this linked to weddings too?
Yes. In some places bees were informed about marriages and other family changes.
Does the custom survive today?
Mostly as folklore, heritage interpretation, and occasional symbolic practice among beekeepers.